Showing posts with label friend. Show all posts
Showing posts with label friend. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 17, 2012

Coming to faith - The story of an Orthodox Jew

Brothers and sisters, my heart’s desire and prayer to God for the Israelites is that they may be saved.  For I can testify about them that they are zealous for God, but their zeal is not based on knowledge.  Since they did not know the righteousness of God and sought to establish their own, they did not submit to God’s righteousness.
Romans 10:1-3 (NIV)

Earlier this week, my wife and I were reading the testimony of an Orthodox Jew who came to faith.  Or to be more correct, my wife was translating a testimony for me while I stared blankly at the computer screen.  I have included an English Translation of the testimony below and the link to the original testimony is here:


As I was reading this testimony, I felt this man gave a clear example of how Jewish people view Christianity.  Christianity is a serious threat to Rabbinic Judaism.  Yeshua spoke against the teachings of the Pharisees, which are the same teachings the Rabbis teach today.

The Rabbis teach Jews about the antiemetic Church.  They teach them all the things the church did in the name of Jesus, in the name of the cross.  They teach how the New Covenant scriptures are the poison that teaches Christians to hate Jews and forbid them from reading them.  If you have time, here is a great article from the Jerusalem Post about how the New Covenant Scriptures were sent to all the members of the Knesset:

Missionaries in the Knesset?

Recently, I have been sharing with you a lot of information about the history between Christians and Jews.  I am not sharing it to make Christians feel guilty, but so that you can understand what is being taught to religious Jews.  I am trying to help you see the Jewish roots in the scriptures, not to change how you live, but so that you can show Jewish people their Messiah in the scriptures written by their people.  Perspective makes all the difference in the world. 

Here is the testimony: 
 

Who are you?
(posted with permission from http://www.oneforisrael.org/)

My name is Yaron. I have been married for 11 years with 3 children. I was born into a religious family; "knitted skullcaps [kippot, yarmulkes or yamakas]", but religion did not fit me at a young age.  I remember myself as a child in primary school, muttering prayers without any conviction.  When I muttered them, too often I never really said them, but it was enough to convey the appropriate amount of devotion to please the teachers.

At that time I knew only the less beautiful portrayals of God and religion. I grew up learning more about the vengeful and punitive, and less about the "merciful God." There was a lot of hypocrisy around me which was very disturbing.  The term "appearance" (it is forbidden to do certain actions which in themselves are not sin, but appear as if they sin, while other actions that are sinful are allowed) was for me the embodiment of the established religious hypocrisy.  It bothered me that there was too much irrelevance in many of the mitzvot, such as: What is the connection between the prohibition of work on Saturday and electrical lighting?  You drag yourself up and down four flights of stairs instead of using the elevator.

Another issue that bothered me was the prayers in the synagogue. How are you going to talk with God and mean every word I say, if half of what I'm saying I do not understand, and the other half I'm not fast enough to complete because the Cantor is in such a hurry to go home.  I'm still on the "Shema" and he has already finished the "Eighteen [Blessings]."

I mustered the courage at age 17 or so, and I confessed to my father that I did not want to have his religious life.  I also left the yeshiva to go to a secular school. My father took it hard and wouldn't talk to me for a year and a half, from twelfth grade, until joining the Army and not much after that. My mom did not take it as hard as my father and she continued to speak with me.  The only thing my father would say to me was "the food is ready,” and other basic things, but he never talked to me.  It was a period of lawlessness for me.  I would go to a restaurant specifically to eat pork and other unclean food.

The turnaround happened at the end of the basic training.  After the induction ceremony, my father approached me and asked to make an agreement.  He said, in light of the situation, that he understands that I am an adult, so he gets my decision regarding the secular life. The agreement was simple: "As long as you are at home - you obey the custom of the house; you wear a skullcap on your head, you do not turn the light on during the Sabbath and you eat only kosher food at home.  Out of the house, you do what you want."  After this we became best friends and the agreement lasted until I was 25 years old, until my wedding.

Genesis 2:24 reads, "… so he left his father and mother, to cleave to his wife, and they become one flesh."  This made me the head of a family and as such I received the authority to act as an "adult."  But the truth is, in the last decade I felt this lack of faith and spirituality.  I looked for it in the arts and all sorts of Eastern religions – New Age.  I even returned to the religion of my father (for real this time) for a few months in late 2008.  I had a great feeling of safety under God and felt His warmth, but again those things from my childhood bothered me.  The Cantor in the synagogue again hurried through the prayers and I quickly looked around and wondered how all the other men thought they could "really talk to God” in their prayers.

It's like what is important to God is to "check off" this morning’s prayers, not whether you prayed from the depths of your soul or had a deep talk with God.  I'm sure I am aggravating an entire religious community who do pray with sincerity, but I can only speak from my own 30 years of experience.

I first learned about Jesus, almost against my will, during my undergraduate studies.  I am studying for a BA in history.  About six months ago I took a course on the "History of the Catholic Church in the Middle Ages."  By the way, this is a dark time period, in religious terms, for Orthodox Judaism.  But the point is, the first thing I had to do was read the New Testament, since you can’t learn about the Catholic Church without knowing the basic concepts of New Testament Christianity.  Lo and behold, my ignorance was lifted, I learned, to my great surprise, that the New Testament was written by the Jewish disciples, about a Jew named Jesus and the events that happened in the Jewish community in Israel.

I must here stop a moment and interrupt my train of thought, to admire the elaborate mechanism of self-preservation that has been instilled in us by the rabbinic tradition for over 2000 years.  Rabbis have no problem reading the Koran, but the New Testament is an abomination.  It is a book we should not touch, let alone read.  It is taboo in the religious community, and rightly so.  “Do not read the New Testament!  This book is dangerous!  You may find the knowledge (you may insert your religious faith here) doesn’t want you to know!”  Who knows, maybe the people will start to believe that the rabbis hid their obvious concerns from you, that the Messiah has already arrived, and no one bothered to tell you.

I realized that Jesus preached right up against all the things that had troubled me about religion from when I was a teenager.  “Be careful not to practice your righteousness in front of others to be seen by them. If you do, you will have no reward from your Father in heaven.  So when you give to the needy, do not announce it with trumpets, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and on the streets, to be honored by others. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full.” Matthew 6:1-2

“When you fast, do not look somber as the hypocrites do, for they disfigure their faces to show others they are fasting. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full.” Matthew 6:16

I still hide my faith underground, leading a double life.  My wife does not know about my faith (although at any given moment there is at least one "new covenant" book in every room in the house, and a lot of Christian literature on the tables.)  I’m not going to bring up the conversation and tell her: "You see, I wanted to tell you that ...", I'm waiting for a question, for the door to open for me to tell her.  At least one of my brothers already knows, but it really does not interest him.  It would be difficult for my parents.

I have had lots and theological debates with my dad recently.  He even agrees with me that there are things that do not make sense (like not being able to use an elevator on Shabbat) but he said he was already used to living like that and he’s not going to change.  My grandmother also told me this, but they do not know that my opinion was not merely secular, but came from somewhere else – from something better.  The guys at work know and it does not bother them.

Jesus sacrificed himself for me, and for you.  He took my sins (which are many) and now, I am saved.  I believe as he taught us.  It's not easy.  Jesus sets before us a much higher standard than that set by the rabbis for themselves.  But this is a subject for another time.

Monday, June 25, 2012

Comments on "The Great Divide" Post

"Nevertheless, each one should retain the place in life that the Lord assigned to him and to which God has called him.  This is the rule I lay down in all the churches.  Was a man already circumcised when he was called?  He should not become uncircumcised.  Was a man uncircumcised when he was called?  He should not be circumcised.  Circumcision is nothing and uncircumcision is nothing.  Keeping God's commands is what counts.  Each should remain in the situation which he was in when God called him."  
- 1 Corinthians 7:17-20


Occasionally I have shared different articles that I have written on other websites.  On one of these websites, I received the following comments regarding my article entitled "The Great Divide."  Unfortunately, I had a limited number of characters to respond, so I have taken this opportunity, since it is my blog, to expound (below).

Here is a link to the original article:  The Great Divide

Here are the comments I received:

Rose Marie:

Shalom !

Thank you for your article ... I agree with your remarks and would like to add something personal :

It is not so much the content of the Messianic Faith in the Jewish roots, it is not either the diverse Jewish practices that I find problematic as a Messianic Jewess myself,
NO, the problem is too often a problem of attitude. Messianic Judaism in Israel is generally Nationalist. Nationalism is not to be found in the New Covenant, except as a negative feature. To love one`s country of adoption or birth, especially Israel, to serve and be faithful to this country is one GOOD thing. To become a nationalist on the other hand is a decision taken at the exclusion of diverse minority groups of people in the Land.

This is not right according to Torah -particularly in the light of the Book of Deuteronomy-, and it is not right according to New Covenant theology either -early believers were not zealots. And it is also not right according to the Prophets !

Our Messiah is the Messiah of all nations ... He came to the Jews first, but also to the Gentiles. All the people of the earth are called to be blessed in Him. Let us not be so exclusive, please ....

Rose-Marie


Hannah:

Hi Michael,

You wrote:

"I want to start out by addressing Messianic Jews and believers, and explain how we sometimes offend Gentiles."

I wasn't sure about how you defined the offense. Do we as Jewish disciples of Yeshua offend Gentile believers when we teach that some Torah commands are covenant obligations for the Jewish people, while other commands are obligations for both Jews and Gentiles? (ie, is this what you called "a double standard"?) Or do we offend only when we allow those different obligations to separate us?

The reason I'm asking is mostly Paul's command in I Cor.7:17-20...
"Only, as the Lord has assigned to each one, as God has called each, in this manner let him walk. And so I direct in all the churches. Was any man called when he was already circumcised? He is not to become uncircumcised. Has anyone been called in uncircumcision? He is not to be circumcised. Circumcision is nothing, and uncircumcision is nothing, but what matters is the keeping of the commandments of God. Each man must remain in that condition in which he was called."

If the Corinthians were all supposed to keep one set of "the commandments of God", Paul wouldn't have had to tell the mixed group to keep the distinction between the Jews (circumcised) and the Gentiles (uncircumcised). OTOH if they could stay unified while "each man remained" either Jew or Gentile, it seems we should be able to do that too.

I guess that leads to another question... what kinds of separation should we consider offensive? For example, should Titus have been offended when Paul and the Jerusalem elders refused to circumcise him (Gal.2:1-3), which made him different from Paul's other partner Timothy? (Acts 16:3)

Thanks for putting your thoughts into writing.

Hannah



Michael:

Hi Hannah,

Thank you for commenting. BTW, this is Michael [Daniel].

So I can better understand your question, which Torah commands are covenant obligations for the Jewish people only? Circumcision? Or is Paul only saying that grown men who come to faith should not feel obligated to get circumcised, but they should still circumcise their children? For me this question is easy, because my wife is Jewish, therefore my children are Jewish. When God makes the covenant with Abraham, doesn’t he also include “those born in your household or bought with money from a foreigner - those who are not your offspring (Genesis 17:12)?” Does this include Gentiles? Have we been bought by the blood of Yeshua? Are we to be considered a part of Abraham’s household as Paul says in Galatians 3:29, “If you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.”

In Acts 15, when the Council of Jerusalem tries to decide what should be required of Gentiles, they conclude in verse 21, “For Moses has been preached in every city from the earliest times and is read in the synagogues on every Sabbath.” Is the implication that Gentiles should know the basics and will learn as they mature in their faith? Don’t the commandments include “whether native-born or an alien living among you?”

If we say that there are separate commandments for Jews and Gentiles, how do we define Jews? As the orthodox do, those with a Jewish mother or those who have converted? In that case, aren’t Gentile believers converting to a type of Judaism called Christianity? Or are you referring to only “literal” descendants of Jacob? In that case, how do we know if my wife, or any Jew, is actually a literal descendant or the descendant of someone who converted to Judaism a hundred or a thousand years ago? David was a descendant of Ruth and Yeshua a descendant of David. Yes, I understand, Ruth converted, but that goes back to my original question, haven’t believing Gentiles “converted” in coming to faith, even if in their ignorance they do not comprehend this? Aren’t Gentiles saying to the Jews, as Ruth said to Naomi, “your God will be my God?”

If you are Jewish, that is a part of your identity, and nobody is trying to take that away. If you want to continue Jewish traditions, because they are a part of who you are, that’s great. If however, you use those traditions, or your identity as a Jew to keep you from fellowshipping with non-Jews, yes that is offensive. OTOH, if you find a particular church to be antisemitic, then that is a legitimate reason not to attend those services, but it shouldn’t keep us from fellowship with them. But in our interactions with them, shouldn’t we be a light, forgiving them as our father has forgiven us?

As Rose Marie said in her comments, “let’s not be exclusive.”

Blessings,

Michael


Upon further reflection:

The bible is full of metaphors and symbolism.  Sometimes it is not so clear when the bible should be taken literally or symbolically.  Adding to this difficulty is the centuries of manuscripts being copied, and the text being translated to different languages from people in different cultural contexts. There are many instances where a play on words is lost in translation.


When I read the verse Hannah quoted, 1 Corinthians 7:17-20 (above), I read it literally.  I believe Paul is telling Gentiles who come to faith in the Jewish Messiah should not become physically circumcised, and Jews coming to faith should not go through a surgical procedure where men would appear to never have been circumcised.  Many Jews were forced to have this procedure done around the time of the Maccabees.

That being said, I don't feel this verse is saying that Jews and Gentiles should act differently after they have come to faith.  Only they should be who they are, who God called them to be and keep the commands.  The verse does not separate commands for Jews and Gentiles as Hannah suggests.


Last week I started my post with the following verse from 1 Corinthians 9:19-23: “For though I am free from all, I have made myself a servant to all, that I might win more of them. To the Jews I became as a Jew, in order to win Jews. To those under the law I became as one under the law (though not being myself under the law) that I might win those under the law. To those outside the law I became as one outside the law (not being outside the law of God but under the law of Christ) that I might win those outside the law. To the weak I became weak, that I might win the weak. I have become all things to all people, that by all means I might save some. I do it all for the sake of the gospel, that I may share with them in its blessings.”  


God called Paul to preach the Gospel to the Gentiles.  My wife and I were called to Israel, and even though I am not Jewish, I have become "as a Jew, in order to win Jews."  Meaning, I do not allow the lifestyle I live to interfere with my witness.  My brother-in-law, who is Jewish, chooses not to live a Jewish lifestyle as he was not called to live a Jewish lifestyle at this time.  He does not hide the fact that he is Jewish, but like Paul he was called to the Gentiles and he does not let his lifestyle interfere with his witness.  I do not think either of us are in sin because of the lifestyles we have chosen.  On the contrary, I believe these are the lives that God has called us to regardless of our ethnic origin.

Monday, June 18, 2012

Heart-to-Heart

“For though I am free from all, I have made myself a servant to all, that I might win more of them. To the Jews I became as a Jew, in order to win Jews. To those under the law I became as one under the law (though not being myself under the law) that I might win those under the law. To those outside the law I became as one outside the law (not being outside the law of God but under the law of Christ) that I might win those outside the law. To the weak I became weak, that I might win the weak. I have become all things to all people, that by all means I might save some. I do it all for the sake of the gospel, that I may share with them in its blessings.”  1 Corinthians 9:19-23


I am not Jewish.  Although this should be obvious from the title of this blog, I felt it should be stated once again.  I say this because the opinions that are stated in this blog need to be read as my opinions.  These are not the opinions of Jewish people or even Messianic Jewish people.  They are my opinions only.  Others may chose to agree or disagree, in whole or in part with anything I have to say.


I wanted to share with you some of the tragedies that have happened throughout history to the Jewish people, but I found that in my presentation of these tragedies I have become too emotionally attached. Therefore, I decided it would be best to share some links with from the Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance.  I found their website to be very concise and informative.


The reason I want to share these tragedies is not to suggest that Jewish people resent Christians as individuals.  They do not.  But I feel many resent the religion of Christianity, to the point where they do not wish to be associated with this religion, due to the multitude of tragedies done in the name of our Savior.  Perhaps, if it was one or two incidents in the last two thousand years, these incidents could be labeled as merely the political agenda of one or two corrupt individuals in history, but as you will see from these links, antisemitism has been a continual and ongoing part of the “Christian” world.  

I put Christian in quotes because I need to define what I mean by the term Christian.  Judaism is not only defined by one’s religion, but by one’s ethnicity.  Similarly, many people have considered themselves “Christian” if their parents were “Christian” or even if they celebrate the secular versions of Christmas and Easter.


I will give an example.  In 1933 the catholic church, in fear of the spread of communism, made an agreement with Hitler not to get involved in his politics, and in return he would leave the catholic church alone.  This agreement was broken by Hitler in 1937 when he began arresting catholic priests.  The protestant church, on the other hand, was split over their views of Hitler. Ludwig Muller, who believed any church member with Jewish ancestry should be expelled, became the “Reich Bishop” or leader of the new Reich Church with the swastika as its symbol and Mein Kampf as its bible. Martin Niemoller, on the other hand, lead a group that called themselves “confessing Christians,” which opposed Hitler and Muller’s beliefs.  Niemoller was arrested by the Gestapo and put in solitary confinement at a concentration camp for 7 years while many other confessing Christians suffered similar fates.


While most of us associate with the catholic or confessing Christians who were persecuted in Nazi Germany, the world also recognizes the Reich Church or German Church, which the majority of Germans belonged to, perhaps in fear of persecution, as being part of Christianity.  I mention this only to share that the world sees all of these people who call themselves Christians, as Christians (and why shouldn’t they), even if a lot of us view many of these so-called Christians as Christians in name only.    


Although the history of the “church” does not affect individual relationships (hopefully if you are reading this blog you know someone who is Jewish who understands you, as a christian, are not anti-Semitic), it does affect how Jews view Christianity as a religion.  For those of us in Jewish ministry, or for anyone who wants to share the Gospel with a Jewish friend, we need to understand the history of antisemitism in the church in order to understand how to share our faith in a meaningful way. 


For those of you who do not have time to read the following links, I want to share a quote from the Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance’s article titled “Christian Apology for the Crusades:”

Among many Jews and Muslims, the term crusade evokes visions of genocide, mass murder, and mass extermination of innocent people. However, among many Christians it has become a positive term, frequently used to refer to mass rallies and campaigns to win converts - as in the Billy Graham Crusades. Out of respect for the victims of the "first holocaust [12,000 Jews in the Rhine Valley alone were killed as the first Crusade passed through]" we recommend that the term be only used to refer to the wars of the Middle Ages.


Here are the links to the Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance:


Recent Articles on Antisemitism: